首页> 外文OA文献 >Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale
【2h】

Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale

机译:城市形态和生命周期能耗:城市规模的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

By combining daily (operations) and embodied energy demands, this work estimates life-cycle energy demands for residents and workers in different city settings. Using life-cycle analyses (LCAs) of different neighborhood types in Austin, Texas, this analysis fabricates five different city types, reflecting actual accessibility and resident and employment density profiles. Five residential and three commercial neighborhood types are distributed across 16-kilometer (10-mile) radius regions, with demographics held constant, for comparability. As expected, per-capita daily energy demands decrease with increased resident and employment density. Interestingly, embodied energy savings via increases in density are substantial. Though embodied energy makes up only 10-20 percent of total life-cycle energy, per-capita savings via density suggest it should be included in planning analyses. Overall, average life-cycle per-capita energy use ranges from 140 gigajoule (GJ)/year/capita in the least dense Orlando-style setting to around 90 GJ/ year/capita in the maximum-density scenario, corresponding to a 35 percent reduction in per-capita energy demand. Energy reductions for Phoenix, Austin, and Seattle settings (relative to an Orlando-based de- sign) are 18, 22, and 24 percent per-capita, respectively. Results provide a rare view of how total annual energy demands in both residential and commercial sectors are affected by density.
机译:通过结合日常(运营)和具体的能源需求,这项工作可以估算不同城市环境中居民和工人的生命周期能源需求。通过使用德克萨斯州奥斯丁市不同社区类型的生命周期分析(LCA),该分析可构建五种不同的城市类型,以反映实际的可及性以及居民和就业密度概况。为了可比较,五种住宅类型和三种商业邻域类型分布在16公里(10英里)半径范围内,人口统计保持不变。正如预期的那样,随着居民和就业密度的增加,人均每日能源需求减少。有趣的是,通过增加密度实现的节能非常可观。尽管包含的能量仅占生命周期总能量的10%至20%,但通过密度实现的人均节省表明,应将其纳入计划分析中。总体而言,人均生命周期的能源使用量从奥兰多最不密集的环境中的每人每年140吉焦耳(GJ)到最大密度的情况下的年人均约90 GJ /年,相当于35%减少人均能源需求。凤凰城,奥斯丁和西雅图的人均能耗降低了18%,22%和24%(相对于基于奥兰多的设计)。结果提供了一个罕见的观点,即住宅和商业部门的年度总能源需求如何受到密度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号